A sigfig is essentially a miniature, plastic avatar of a person, usually either resembling the individual in some way, or a plastic LEGO version of that person's favorite fictional character (or historical figure). Personally, I cobbled together a minifigure that kinda-sorta resembles me. My sigfig's hair is usually a black plastic "wig," with the length roughly corresponding to my actual hair at the time of the photograph, unless my sigfig is "cosplaying" as someone else. (It gets a little complicated sometimes.)
My sigfig's face comes from a Jurassic World character named Simon Masrani, or at least the LEGO minifigure version of the character. I haven't seen the movie yet, so I have no idea who Simon Masrani is supposed to be. Perhaps he gets eaten by a dinosaur. All I know is that that particular head is made of "medium dark flesh" plastic, and the printed face has facial hair. The head actually has two facial expressions on either side: A snarky, sardonic smile and a shocked, scared gaping mouth. I use the smile for most photos; I use the open mouth for more humorous photos, as well as a "singing" face for my lazily-produced music videos.
|My sigfig is cosplaying Doc Brown, with some flux and a capacitor.|
My sigfig's hands usually are medium dark flesh in color, and that's how you make my LEGO sigfig. To summarize, my sigfig consists of an approximation of my current hairstyle, Simon Masrani's minifigure head, the outfit-of-the-day torso, the outfit-of-the-day legs, and medium dark flesh hands.
The frequency of these sigfig photos on my social media profiles has got me thinking about why I take these sort of photos, and why I post these photos on the Web. I could easily take frequent selfies, just like almost everyone else, but I'd rather not do that. Do I take sigfig photos to appear less "narcissistic"? Is the sigfig photo an "unselfie"?
On the other hand, nothing can me more "narcissistic" than cobbling together an avatar that kinda-sorta resembles oneself. It's basically like chiseling a gigantic marble statue of oneself, but as a tiny, plastic, cutesy thing. Do I take sigfig photos to appear satirically and/or exaggeratedly egomaniacal? Is the sigfig photo the "ultimate selfie"?
We'll never know. Okay, I think I'm trying to go for "satirical narcissism," at least I hope I am.
What I do know is that the sigfig photo has one advantage over the selfie: I get to be behind the camera to compose a shot, like a proper photographer. With a selfie, the person is also the subject of the snapshot, so his/her eyes will usually look into the camera's lens, and not at the framing and composition of the shot, at the moment of the shutter. With a sigfig photo, I get to control the shot as much as possible, and I get to place my avatar into unusual, amusing situations.
Also, food photos are exponentially more interesting with a sigfig in the foreground, holding tiny plastic versions of the actual food (in the background).
|We're having second breakfast at a car dealership's service department.|
|This Star Wars torso is the closest I can get to the dark grey Oswald the Lucky Rabbit T-shirt I wore that day.|
In any case, the sigfig photo is a fun way to express my own fluctuatingly healthy and unhealthy sense of self. It's a parody ... in which I am fantastic and self-effacing at the same time.
|My real denim jacket isn't the same shade of blue as my sigfig, but the dark red V-neck jumper is spot-on.|
May everything be awesome in flesh-and-bone, as it is in plastic-and-ink.